Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Steps in runDRAP workflow

This workflow is used to produce an assembly from one sample/tissue/development stage. It take as input R1 from single-end sequencing or R1 and R2 from paired-end sequencing and eventually a reference proteins set from closest species with known proteins.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2284v1/supp-1

Steps in runMeta workflow

This workflow is used to produce a merged assembly from several samples/tissues/development stage outputted by runDRAP. Inputs are runDRAP output folders and eventually a reference protein set.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2284v1/supp-2

Steps in runAssessment workflow

This workflow is used to evaluate quality for one assembly or for compare several assemblies produced from the same dataset. Inputs are the assembly/ies, R1 and eventually R2, and a reference protein set.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2284v1/supp-3

Contig validation using exon re-alignment and order checkin

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2284v1/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Cédric Cabau conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Frédéric Escudié performed the experiments, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Anis Djari performed the experiments.

Yann Guiguen analyzed the data.

Julien Bobe analyzed the data.

Christophe Klopp conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Software web site: http://www.sigenae.org/drap

Funding

This work was supported by funds from the ANR (http://www.agence-nationale-recherche.fr/) in the frame of the PhyloFish (ANR-10-GENM-017) and the France Génomique (ANR10-INBS-09-08) projects. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies