Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Raw data from well diffusion assays

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2282v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jean-Baptiste Raina conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Dianne Tapiolas analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Cherie A Motti analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Sylvain Foret analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Torsten Seemann analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jan Tebben analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Bette L Willis conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David G Bourne conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority

Permit number:

G12/35236.1

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

GenBank.

All accession numbers are provided in the main text.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

GenBank: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/

Funding

This work was supported by the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, AIMS@JCU, James Cook University and the Australian Institute of Marine Science. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies