Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors report no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Thomas Ragole analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Erin Slason performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Peter Teale conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Martin Reite conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Donald C. Rojas conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All subjects gave informed consent to participate in this research in line with the requirements of the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB #03-793) and the principles for ethical research contained in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All subjects gave informed consent to participate in this research in line with the requirements of the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB #03-793) and the principles for ethical research contained in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Grant Disclosures

The following grant information was disclosed by the authors:

This work was funded by NIH grants R25 MH080859 and R01 MH60214

Funding

This work was funded by NIH grants R25 MH080859 and R01 MH60214 The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies