Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Figure 1: SOS DescribeSensor request in HTTP for metadata of a DX-500 Ion Chromatograph and relative response in XML

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2233v2/supp-1

Figure 2: HTML page, provided by GET-IT, for metadata of a DX-500 Ion Chromatograph

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2233v2/supp-2

Figure 3: GET-IT form for InsertObservation

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2233v2/supp-3

Figure 4: GET-IT web map and graphical dialogue window to show results of GetObservation

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2233v2/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Simone Lanucara conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work.

Paola Carrara conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Alessandro Oggioni conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, performed the computation work, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Michela Rogora conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lyudmila Kamburska conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Giampaolo Rossetti conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

http://sk.ise.cnr.it/

Funding

NextData Data-LTER-Mountain provided funding for this work. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Feedback on other revisions


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies