Probabilistic graph models for landscape genetics

Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.2225v4
Subject Areas
Computational Biology, Scientific Computing and Simulation, Spatial and Geographic Information Systems
Keywords
Landscape genetics, Graph models, Bayesian inference, Open source software, Software development, Population genetics
Copyright
© 2017 Milligan
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Milligan BG. 2017. Probabilistic graph models for landscape genetics. PeerJ Preprints 5:e2225v4

Abstract

Landscape genetics combines population genetics, landscape ecology, and spatial analysis to identify landscape and genetic factors that influence genetic and genomic variation. Progress in the field depends on a strong conceptual foundation and the means of identifying mechanistic connnections between environmental factors, landscape features, and genetic or genomic variation. Many existing approaches and much of the software commonly in use was developed for population genetics or statistics and is not entirely appropriate for landscape genetics. Probabilistic graph models provide a statistically rigorous and flexible means of constructing models directly applicable to landscape genetics. Probabilistic graph models also allow construction of mechanistic models, which are crucial elements in testing hypotheses. Sophisticated software exists for the analysis of graph models; however, much of it does not handle the types of data used for landscape genetics, model structures involving autoregressive spatial interaction between variables, or the scale of landscape genetics problems. Thus, an important priority for the field is to develop suitably flexible software tools for graph models that overcome these problems and allow landscape geneticists to explore meaningfully mechanistic and flexible models. We are developing such a library and applying it to examples in landscape genetics.

Author Comment

This paper has been extended from the OGRS2016 Proceedings version into a fully detailed manuscript. Consequently, it now includes the table and figures originally intended.

Supplemental Information

C++ code for verbatim insert in Figure 4

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2225v4/supp-1