Did an Ebola outbreak influence the 2014 U.S. federal elections? (Hint: Only if you ignore autocorrelation)

School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America
Center for Evolution & Medicine, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.2165v2
Subject Areas
Anthropology, Evolutionary Studies, Psychiatry and Psychology, Statistics
Keywords
Behavioral Immune System, Infectious Disease, Voter Behavior, Political Attitudes, Autocorrelation, Time Series, Observational Data, Ebola
Copyright
© 2016 Tiokhin et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Tiokhin L, Hruschka D. 2016. Did an Ebola outbreak influence the 2014 U.S. federal elections? (Hint: Only if you ignore autocorrelation) PeerJ Preprints 4:e2165v2

Abstract

In a recent paper, Beall, Hofer, and Schaller (2016) use observational time series data to test the hypothesis that the 2014 Ebola outbreak influenced the 2014 U.S. Federal Elections. They find substantial associations between online search volume for Ebola and people’s tendency to vote Republican, an effect observed primarily in states with norms favoring Republican candidates. However, the analyses do not deal with the well-known problem of temporal autocorrelation in time series. We show that all variables analyzed exhibit extremely high levels of temporal autocorrelation (i.e. similarity in data-point values across time). After appropriately removing first-order autocorrelation, the observed relationships are attenuated and non-significant. This suggests that either no real associations exist, or that existing data are insufficiently powered to test the proposed hypotheses. We conclude by highlighting other pitfalls of observational data analysis, and draw attention to analytical strategies developed in related disciplines for avoiding these errors.

Author Comment

Subject Areas updated to include "Statistics" & "Psychiatry and Psychology".

Supplemental Information

Study 1 R Code for Analyses

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2165v2/supp-4

Study 2 R Code for Analyses

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2165v2/supp-5

Supplementary Materials for "Did an Ebola Outbreak Influence the 2014 U.S. Federal Elections? (Hint: Only if you ignore autocorrelation)."

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2165v2/supp-6