Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Data from transect sampling (sediment cover, depth, and colony condition) and photo-ed colony areas

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2146v1/supp-1

Transect Data by Habitat Type

Percentage of scleractinian corals at each site with recent partial mortality, sediment accumulation, or sediment halo and number of corals from the belt transects partitioned by habitat type. Percentage of survey points with sediment over hardbottom and deep sediment from line-intercept transects.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2146v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Margaret W Miller conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jocelyn Karazsia conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Carolyn E Groves analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Sean Griffin conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Tom Moore conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Pace Wilber conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Kurtis Gregg performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied in a supplementary file

Funding

This work was funded by the NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service and Coral Reef Conservation Programs The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies