Who’s your mama? Riverine hybridisation of threatened freshwater Trout Cod and Murray Cod

Rates of hybridization and introgression are increasing dramatically worldwide because of translocations, restocking of organisms and habitat modifications (Allendorf et al., 2001) thus determining whether hybridization is beneficial or detrimental for the species involved is commensurately important for conservation. Restocking programs are sometimes criticized because of the genetic consequences of hatchery-bred fish breeding with wild populations. These concerns are important to conservation restocking programs, including Percichthyidae. Two of the better known Australian Percichthyidae are the Murray Cod (Maccullochella peelii) and Trout Cod (Maccullochella macquariensis) which were formerly widespread over the Murray Darling Basin. In much of the Murrumbidgee River Trout Cod and Murray Cod were sympatric until the late 1970s when Trout Cod were extirpated. Here we use genetic SNP data to examine hybridization and introgression between Murray Cod and Trout Cod in the upper Murrumbidgee River and consider implications for restocking programs. For the first time we have confirmed restocked riverine Trout Cod as reproducing in the wild. We detected hybrid Trout Cod-Murray Cod in the Upper Murrumbidgee, recording the first hybrid larvae in the wild. Although hybrid larvae, juveniles and adults have been recorded in hatcheries and impoundments, and hybrid adults have been recorded in rivers previously (Douglas, Gooley & Ingram, 1994a; Douglas et al., 1995) , this is the first time fertile F1 have been recorded in the wild. The F1 backcrosses with Murray cod have also been found to be fertile. All backcrosses noted were with pure Murray Cod. Such introgression has not been recorded previously in these two species, and the imbalance in hybridization direction may have important implications for restocking programs.