Visitors   Views   Downloads

Response of endemic and exotic earthworm communities to ecological restoration

View preprint
6 preprints already posted in July! From human evolution to importance of sponges in supporting fish communities https://t.co/5Z5UXROT0y
RT @jessicapolka: Anyone know of other sources for ecology preprints, besides https://t.co/smOHlfPjjs & https://t.co/gMmZM4Z48u ? #ASAPb…
RT @jessicapolka: Anyone know of other sources for ecology preprints, besides https://t.co/smOHlfPjjs & https://t.co/gMmZM4Z48u ? #ASAPb…
RT @jessicapolka: Anyone know of other sources for ecology preprints, besides https://t.co/smOHlfPjjs & https://t.co/gMmZM4Z48u ? #ASAPb…
RT @jessicapolka: Anyone know of other sources for ecology preprints, besides https://t.co/smOHlfPjjs & https://t.co/gMmZM4Z48u ? #ASAPb…
Anyone know of other sources for ecology preprints, besides https://t.co/smOHlfPjjs & https://t.co/gMmZM4Z48u ? #ASAPbio https://t.co/doHnGa4Mgb
@blahah404 @mdshawkey @macmanes And also this list https://t.co/qsJJtuOCGa from our field. Not really worth insulting Rik either, he's an enormous help to researchers
View all our #ecology preprints from this month in one place here: https://t.co/8RufZQEGvw
RT @sn_will: @lucaborger @PeerJPreprints Hi Luca, @peerjpreprints encourages ecology preprints. This was an error from 2016. All our ecolog…
@lucaborger @PeerJPreprints Hi Luca, @peerjpreprints encourages ecology preprints. This was an error from 2016. All our ecology preprints here https://t.co/BTwiYaFSTQ
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Earthworm sampling data

Earthworm counts and biomass from 12 sampling sites in Punakaiki and 12 sampling sites on Quail Island

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2017v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Stéphane Boyer conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Young-Nam Kim performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mike H Bowie performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Marie-Caroline Lefort analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nicholas M Dickinson performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

New Zealand Department Of Conservation (DOC). Permit CA-28815-FAU.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a Supplemental Dataset.

Funding

Funding for the work at Punakaiki was provided by Rio Tinto Limited as part of the Punakaiki Costal Restoration Project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies