Javascript is disabled in your browser. Please
enable Javascript
to view PeerJ.
October 2016
Table of Contents - PeerJ Preprints
Sorted by downloads
Publication date
Downloads
Pageviews
Preprints
PeerJ - Medicine articles
PeerJ - Biology & Life science articles
PeerJ - General bio (stats, legal, policy, edu)
PeerJ Computer Science
PeerJ Preprints
environmental-sciences
biodiversity
Login to save + alerts
September 17, 2016 - Version: 1
10 simple rules for experimental design in ecology
Neha Saini
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2455v1
September 18, 2016 - Version: 1
10 simple rules for developing the best experimental design in biology
Angela Joseph
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2456v1
September 13, 2016 - Version: 1
10 simple rules for designing and analyzing field experiments in ecology
Basma Nazal
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2441v1
September 23, 2016 - Version: 1
Community assembly and functional leaf traits mediate precipitation use efficiency of alpine grasslands along environmental gradients on the Tibetan Plateau
Shaowei Li
,
Jianshuang Wu
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2472v1
← Previous
1
Next →
Archives - Preprints
environmental-sciences
biodiversity
2018
May
1
2017
August
2
July
0
June
0
May
2
April
0
March
2
February
0
January
2
2016
December
1
November
1
October
0
September
4
August
5
July
0
June
0
May
2
April
2
March
0
February
0
January
2
2015
December
1
November
3
October
1
September
0
August
1
July
2
June
0
May
4
April
0
March
1
February
1
January
1
2014
December
1
November
2
October
2
September
0
August
1
July
0
June
2
May
0
April
1
2013
December
1
November
1
Filter on subjects this month
agricultural-science
1
animal-behavior
1
biodiversity
4
biogeography
1
ecology
4
ecosystem-science
2
environmental-sciences
4
marine-biology
1
plant-science
1
I told my colleagues that PeerJ is a journal where they need to publish if they want their paper to be published quickly and with the strict peer review expected from a good journal.
Sohath Vanegas,
PeerJ Author
View author feedback