August 2016

Table of Contents - PeerJ Preprints

August 31, 2016 - Version: 5
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.756v5
August 17, 2016 - Version: 5
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.552v5
August 19, 2016 - Version: 1
, , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2378v1
August 22, 2016 - Version: 1
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2382v1
August 15, 2016 - Version: 2
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1315v2
August 22, 2016 - Version: 2
,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2377v2
August 8, 2016 - Version: 2
, , , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2077v2
August 24, 2016 - Version: 1
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2390v1
August 27, 2016 - Version: 1
, , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2393v1
August 28, 2016 - Version: 1
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2399v1
August 15, 2016 - Version: 1
, , , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2359v1
August 6, 2016 - Version: 1
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2342v1
August 25, 2016 - Version: 1
,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2392v1
I told my colleagues that PeerJ is a journal where they need to publish if they want their paper to be published quickly and with the strict peer review expected from a good journal.
Sohath Vanegas,
PeerJ Author
View author feedback