Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

List of sampling localities of Calomera littoralis

Collection site codes (Abbr.), additional information’s (country, geographical coordinates), distinct operational taxonomic units (OTU ABDG), number of specimens used in molecular and morphological analyses (N), COI haplotypes, as well as GenBank accession numbers (Acc. nos. COI), SL – Southern lineage, NL – Northern lineage.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2010v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Radomir Jaskuła conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Tomasz Rewicz conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mateusz Płóciennik analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Michał Grabowski conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The sequence data and trace files were uploaded to BOLD and subsequently also to GenBank (accession nos KU905171-KU905339).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any raw data.

Funding

The study was partly funded by the statutory fundings of the University of Lodz. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies