Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Raw data with analyses, PeerJ-9517 Potential ecosystem service delivery by endemic plants in New Zealand vineyards

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1995v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Prof. Stephen D. Wratten is an Academic Editor for PeerJ. David J. Saville is an employee of Saville Statistical Consulting Limited.

Author Contributions

Morgan Shields wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jean-Marie Tompkins conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David J Saville conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Colin D Meurk contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Stephen Wratten conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a Supplemental Dataset.

Funding

We greatly appreciate the financial support of the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (LINX 0303), the Bio-Protection Research Centre and Lincoln University which funded this research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies