Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Checklist of resident bird species in five dry forest fragments in northwestern Costa Rica

Table S1. Checklist of resident bird species recorded in five dry forest fragments in northwestern Costa Rica: SR – Santa Rosa, PV – Palo Verde, RV – Rincón de la Vieja, Dir – Diriá, CB – Cabo Blanco.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1970v1/supp-1

R script for Lomolino function

R script for the Lomolino function.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1970v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Gilbert Barrantes conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, bird surveys.

Diego Ocampo conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, bird surveys.

José D. Ramírez-Fernández conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, bird surveys.

Eric J Fuchs analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a Supplemental Dataset.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies