Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplementary Information: Apache Fuseki configuration

Supplementary Information: Apache Fuseki configuration

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1932v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

All authors are employees of Collaborative Drug Discovery, Inc.

Author Contributions

Alex M Clark conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nadia K Litterman conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Janice E Kranz conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Peter Gund analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Kellan Gregory contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Barry A Bunin contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

https://github.com/cdd/bioassay-template

Funding

This work was funded in part from the NIH NCATS Phase 2 SBIR Grant # 2R44TR000185-02 “Simplifying Encoding of Bioassays to Accelerate Drug Discovery” as described on https://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies