Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Berhaman Ahmad analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Claudia Baider analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Benedetta Bernardini analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Edward Biffin analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Fabian Brambach analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David Burslem analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

James W Byng conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Maarten Christenhusz analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

F. B. Vincent Florens analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Eve Lucas analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Avik Ray analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Rajasri Ray analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Erik Smets analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Neil Snow conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Joeri S Strijk analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Peter G. Wilson conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any raw data.

Funding

Plant Gateway Ltd. provided funding for this work. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies