Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Correlations among biomarkers

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1918v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Yakhya Dieye conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Babacar Mbengue conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Shobha Dagamajalu performed the experiments.

Mouhamadou M Fall diagnosis of malaria, determination of blood parameters, treatment of patients.

Mun Fai Loke contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Cheikh M Nguer analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables.

Alassane Thiam performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables.

Jamuna Vadivelu contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Alioune Dieye conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

1. Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar’s institutional research ethics committee.

2. Protocol Number 001/2015/CER/UCAD.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

n/a

Funding

This study was supported by University of Malaya-Ministry of Education (UM-MoE) High Impact Research (HIR) Grant UM.C/625/1/HIR/MoE/CHAN/13/6 (account no. H-50001-A000034). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies