Visitors   Views   Downloads
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Figure 1: Experimental design for groups divided

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1870v1/supp-1

Figure 2: Spontaneous alternation times in Tmaze in Kunming mice

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1870v1/supp-2

Figure 3: Immunohistochemical analysis of ADAR1 positive cells in the brain of Kunming mice

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1870v1/supp-3

Figure 4: The results of Western blot in the hippocampus and frontal cortex of Kunming mice

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1870v1/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Wei Chen conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Dong An conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables.

Hong Xu performed the experiments.

Xiaoxin Cheng performed the experiments.

Shiwei Wang analyzed the data.

Weizhi Yu performed the experiments.

Deqin Yu performed the experiments.

Dan Zhao performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables.

Yiping Sun contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Wuguo Deng contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Yiyuan Tang contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, advice the manuscript.

Shengming Yin conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The Tab of Animal Experimental Ethical Inspection - Number: L20140021

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

we will provide the raw data.


This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31201724). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies