Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Article S1. The regulatory framework of listing, reclassification, and recovery

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1860v2/supp-1

Information that might be given to FWS biologists as training for scoring threats and demography changes

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1860v2/supp-2

Table S1. Cross-tabulation of taxonomic groups represented in our dataset

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1860v2/supp-3

Table S2. Examples of text from Fish and Wildlife Service five-year reviews that resulted in different scores across the key in Table 1 of the main text

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1860v2/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jacob W Malcom conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Whitney M Webber conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ya-Wei Li conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Data and code available at GitHub:

https://github.com/Defenders-ESC/threat_demography_score

Data available at figshare:

https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3436763.v1

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies