Constructing social identity? Potential non-nutritional functions of chimpanzee insectivory

Department of Biological Sciences, Taraba State University, Jalingo, Nigeria
Department of Anthropology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.1845v1
Subject Areas
Animal Behavior, Anthropology, Zoology
Keywords
insectivory, nutrition, chimpanzees, social identity
Copyright
© 2016 Buba et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Buba U, Sommer V, Jesus G, Pascual-Garrido A. 2016. Constructing social identity? Potential non-nutritional functions of chimpanzee insectivory. PeerJ Preprints 4:e1845v1

Abstract

Many animals, including humans and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), eat insects, although frequencies vary greatly between populations. Insects are traditionally either seen as desired nourishment or a fallback fare compensating a shortage of preferred foods. We test these explanations against long-term data on chimpanzees at Gashaka, Nigeria. Here, chimpanzees harvest army ants much more frequently than elsewhere, while termite eating is completely absent. We report a pattern of strict seasonality in terms of rainfall and pronounced peaks in the abundance of fruit, the chimpanzees’ preferred staple food. Even so, evidence based on recovered ant-dipping wands and chimpanzee faecal samples indicates that myrmecophagy does not decrease when fruit becomes more abundant. Instead, ant-eating is virtually constant year round and chimpanzees eat them every other day or so. This contradicts the fallback hypothesis and supports the hypothesis of ants as preferred food. Army ants may thus serve as a supplement or complement in terms of macro - or micronutrients to the chimpanzees. Nevertheless, it remains puzzling why termites are not eaten at Gashaka, despite apparent availability and technological skills to extract insects. We therefore propose that dietary choices are also likely to contain a social element. The non-consumption of a perfectly edible food-item may reflect a "taboo" that comes at some cost. Similarly, army ant gathering is associated with painful bites, and self-experiments suggest that the highly chitinous insects do not taste well, compared to smaller arboreal ants and termites. We speculate that, in this way, mental concepts of identity versus otherness may develop that strengthen group cohesion. We do not have sufficient data for Nigeria, but speculations about social identity based on community-dependent behavioural uniformity are open to empirical testing. The principal method would be to document natural instances of “acculturation”, when female chimpanzees transfer from their natal into a neighbouring community.

Author Comment

This is an abstract which has been accepted for the "Chimpanzees in Context" symposium”