Microbes in deionized water: Implications for maintenance of laboratory water production system
- Published
- Accepted
- Subject Areas
- Biochemistry, Biodiversity, Ecology, Environmental Sciences, Microbiology
- Keywords
- biofilm, water quality, microbial ecology, chlorine residual, tap water, deionized water, disinfection, microbial flora, viable but not cultivable (VBNC), nutrient poor
- Copyright
- © 2017 Ng
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- Cite this article
- 2017. Microbes in deionized water: Implications for maintenance of laboratory water production system. PeerJ Preprints 5:e181v5 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.181v5
Abstract
Microbes, with their vast metabolic capabilities and great adaptability, occupy almost every conceivable ecological niche on Earth. Thus, could they survive in the oligotrophic (i.e., nutrient poor) deionized (DI) water that we use for experiments? Observations of white cauliflower-like lumps and black specks in salt solutions after months of storage in plastic bottles prompted the inquisition concerning the origin and nature of the “contaminants”. Hypothesizing that the “contaminants” may be microbes from DI water, a series of growth experiments was conducted to detect and profile the diversity of microbes in fresh DI water, produced on a just-in-time basis by a filter cum ion exchange system with tap water as feed. While microbes could also be present on the surfaces and headspace of the unsterilized polyethylene bottles, investigating whether microbes are present in freshly produced DI water provides a more stringent performance test of the production system. Inoculation of DI water on R2A agar followed by multi-day aerobic cultivation revealed the presence of a wide variety of microbes (total viable cell concentration of ~103 colony forming units (CFU) per mL) with differing pigmentations, growth rates, as well as colony sizes and morphologies. Additionally, greater abundance and diversity of microorganisms was recovered at 30 oC compared to 25 and 37 oC; most probably due to adaptation of microbes to tropical ambient water temperatures of 25 to 30 oC. Comparative experiments with tap water as inoculum recovered a significantly smaller number and diversity of microorganisms; thus, suggesting that monochloramine residual disinfectant in tap water was effective in inhibiting cell viability. In contrast, possible removal of monochloramine by adsorption onto ion exchange resins (and thus, alleviation of a source of environmental stress) might explain the observed greater diversity and abundance of viable microbes in DI water. Collectively, this study confirmed the presence of microbes in fresh DI water, and suggested a possible source of the “contaminants” in prepared salt solutions. Propensity of microbes in forming biofilm on various surfaces suggested that intermittent flow in just-in-time DI water production provided opportunities for cell attachment and biofilm formation during water stagnation, and subsequent dislodgement and resuspension of cells upon water flow. Thus, regular maintenance and cleaning of the production system should help reduce DI water’s microorganism load. In addition, simple and low cost culture experiments on solid medium can provide a qualitative and semi-quantitative estimate of microbial diversity and viable cell concentration in DI water, respectively. The above, together with regular monitoring of water resistivity or conductivity, comprise a trio of tests useful for detecting possible contamination, or deterioration of DI water’s chemical and microbiological quality.
Author Comment
Language and logic flow was improved in this version.