Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Raw data of Ct values in qPCR, 60 samples

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1753v1/supp-1

Raw data of Ct values in qPCR, 30 samples

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1753v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

I-Hua Chen performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jiann-Hsiung Wang analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Shih-Jen Chou analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Yeong-Huey Wu performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Tsung-Hsien Li performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ming-Yih Leu performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Wen-Been Chang performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Wei Cheng Yang conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Council of Agriculture of Taiwan (Approval number 1020727724)

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

qPCR raw data

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies