Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Alexander L Bond conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Michelle M Risi performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Christopher W Jones performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Peter G Ryan conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Not required for this work

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Permission was granted by Tristan da Cunha Conservation Department and Island Council.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Bond, A. (2016): Data from Potential for primary poisoning of a Critically Endangered endemic land bird during rodent eradication operations at Gough Island, Tristan da Cunha. figshare.

https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2112457.v1

Funding

The RSPB, the UK partner in BirdLife International, funded this research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies