Sympathy for the devil: a conservation strategy for devil and manta rays

Earth to Ocean Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
Shark Advocates International, The Ocean Foundation, Washington, District of Columbia, The United States of America
WildAid, San Francisco, California, The United States of America
Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Manta Trust, Dorchester, Dorset, United Kingdom
Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
Blue Resources, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Project AWARE Foundation, Rancho Santa Margarita, California, The United States of America
Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture & College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University of North Queensland, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture & School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
Tethys Research Institute, Milan, Italy
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.1731v1
Subject Areas
Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science, Conservation Biology, Marine Biology, Science Policy
Keywords
Elasmobranch, Conservation planning, Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), Extinction risk, International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs), Tourism, Wildlife trade
Copyright
© 2016 Lawson et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Lawson JM, Walls RH, Fordham SV, O'Malley MP, Heupel MR, Stevens G, Fernando D, Budziak A, Simpfendorfer CA, Davidson LN, Ender I, Francis MP, Notarbartolo di Sciara G, Dulvy NK. 2016. Sympathy for the devil: a conservation strategy for devil and manta rays. PeerJ PrePrints 4:e1731v1

Abstract

Background. Increased interest in luxury products and Traditional Chinese Medicine, associated with economic growth in China, has been linked to depletion of both terrestrial and marine wildlife. Among the most rapidly emerging concerns with respect to these markets is the relatively new demand for gill plates, or Peng Yu Sai (“Fish Gills”), from devil and manta rays (subfamily Mobulinae). The high value of gill plates drives international trade supplied by largely unmonitored and unregulated bycatch and target fisheries around the world. Devil and manta rays are especially sensitive to overexploitation because of their exceptionally low productivity (maximum intrinsic rate of population increase). Scientific research, conservation campaigns, as well as international and national protections that restrict fishing or trade have increased in recent years. Many key protections, however, apply only to manta rays. Methods. We review the state of the development of scientific knowledge and capacity for these species, and summarise the geographic ranges, fisheries and national and international protections for these species. We use a conservation planning approach to develop the Global Devil and Manta Ray Conservation Strategy, specifying a vision, goals, objectives, and actions to advance the conservation of both devil and manta rays. Results and Discussion. Generally, there is greater scientific attention and conservation focused on Manta compared to Devil Rays. We discuss how the successes in manta ray conservation can be expanded to benefit devil rays. We also examine solutions for the two leading threats to both devil and manta rays – bycatch and target fisheries. First, we examine how can the impact of bycatch fisheries can be reduced through international measures and best-practice handling techniques. Second, we examine the role that responsible trade and demand can play in reducing target fisheries for gill plates. Our paper suggests that given similarities in sensitivity and appearance, particularly of the dried gill plate product, conservation measures may need to be harmonised particularly for the larger species in this subfamily.

Author Comment

This is a preprint submission to PeerJ Preprints.

Supplemental Information

Images of devil and manta rays

(a) Reef Manta Ray (Manta alfredi); (b) Oceanic Manta Ray (Manta birostris); (c) Shortfin Devil Ray (Mobula kuhlii); (d) Smoothtail Devil Ray (Mobula munkiana).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1731v1/supp-1

Distribution maps for manta and devil ray species

Area of Occupancy (AOO) and Extent of Occurrence (EOO) maps for all nine species of devil ray: (a) Mobula japanica, (b) M. eregoodootenkee, (c) M. hypostoma, (d) M. rochebrunei, (e) M. kuhlii, (f) M. mobular, (g) M. munkiana, (h) M. tarapacana, (i) M. thurstoni; and both species of manta ray: (j) Manta alfredi, (k) M. birostris.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1731v1/supp-2

Expert representation at the Global Devil and Manta Ray Conservation Strategy workshop and among respondents to the devil and manta ray survey

(a) The number of workshop attendees with expertise from each Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Major Fishing Area (MFA) is represented by degree of colour saturation. (b) Geographic FAO MFA expertise of devil and manta ray survey respondents. The grey outlines around the countries indicate the presence of one or more mobulid species, with grey saturation representing areas of mobulid Area of Occupancy overlap (>1 species).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1731v1/supp-3

Distribution of Parties to CITES and CMS with respect to ranges of (a) Manta spp. and (b) Mobula spp

Area of Occupancy (AOO) maps for single or multiple species of (a) manta ray (Manta spp.) in blue, and (b) devil ray (Mobula spp.) in green. Saturation of colour represents the degree which species’ ranges overlap: dark blue for manta ray and dark green for devil rays are areas with >1 species AOO. Country colour represents management implementation; Parties to both the Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) and the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) are indicated in light yellow, Parties only to CITES are light grey, Parties only to CMS are dark yellow, and Non-Parties are in black. Also indicated are known target (T) and bycatch (B) fisheries adapted from Croll et al., 2015.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1731v1/supp-4

Distribution of national, territory, and state protections with respect to ranges of (a) Manta spp. and (b) Mobula spp

Area of Occupancy (AOO) maps for single or multiple species of (a) manta ray (Manta spp.) in blue, and (b) devil ray (Mobula spp.) in green. Saturation of colour represents the degree which species’ ranges overlap: dark blue for manta ray and dark green for devil rays are areas with >1 species AOO. Country colour represents national, territory, or state protections; purple represents those countries that have implemented both a fishing and trade restriction, yellow are those countries with only a fishing restriction. Small island countries are circled for visual purposes.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1731v1/supp-5

International, national, and territory/state protections currently in place for devil and manta rays

A summary of current international, national, and territory/state protections for the eleven species of devil (Mobula spp.) and manta (Manta spp.) rays, and the year that these protections were implemented.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1731v1/supp-6

The Global Devil and Manta Ray Conservation Strategy

The complete text of the Global Devil and Manta Ray Conservation Strategy; including a vision, and a series of goals, objectives, and actions.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1731v1/supp-7