Evolutionary relationships within the lamioid tribe Synandreae (Lamiaceae) based on multiple low-copy nuclear loci

Department of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
Current address: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Current address: Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
Department of Environmental and Plant Biology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA
Museum of Archaeology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.1725v1
Subject Areas
Biogeography, Evolutionary Studies, Genetics, Plant Science, Taxonomy
Keywords
Synandreae, Biogeography, Phylogeny, Stachydeae, Nuclear markers, North America, Physostegia, Lamiaceae
Copyright
© 2016 Roy et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Roy T, Catlin NS, Garner DMG, Cantino PD, Scheen A, Lindqvist C. 2016. Evolutionary relationships within the lamioid tribe Synandreae (Lamiaceae) based on multiple low-copy nuclear loci. PeerJ PrePrints 4:e1725v1

Abstract

The subfamily Lamioideae (Lamiaceae) comprises ten tribes, of which only Stachydeae and Synandreae include New World members. Previous studies have investigated the phylogenetic relationships among the members of Synandreae based on plastid and nuclear ribosomal DNA loci. In an effort to re-examine the phylogenetic relationships within Synandreae, the current study incorporates data from four low-copy nuclear loci, PHOT1, PHOT2, COR, and PPR. Our results confirm previous studies based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal markers in supporting monophyly of tribe Synandreae, as well as sister relationships between Brazoria and Warnockia, and between that pair of genera and a monophyletic Physostegia. However, we observe incongruence in the relationships of Macbridea and Synandra. The placement of Synandreae within Lamioideae is poorly resolved and incongruent among different analyses, and the sister group of Synandreae remains enigmatic. Comparison of the colonization and migration patterns corroborates a single colonization of the New World by Synandreae during the mid-Miocene. This is in contrast to the only other lamioid tribe that includes New World members, Stachydeae, which colonized the New World at least twice—during the mid-Miocene and Pliocene. Edaphic conditions and intolerance of soil acidity may be factors that restricted the distribution of most genera of Synandreae to southeastern and south-central North America, whereas polyploidy could have increased the colonizing capability of the more wide-ranging genus, Physostegia.

Author Comment

This is a preprint submission to PeerJ PrePrints.

Supplemental Information

DNA sequence alignment of the PHOT1 locus

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1725v1/supp-1

DNA sequence alignment of the PHOT2 locus

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1725v1/supp-2

DNA sequence alignment of the COR locus

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1725v1/supp-3