Anxiolytic effects of fluoxetine and nicotine exposure on exploratory behavior in zebrafish

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, United States
Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.1718v1
Subject Areas
Animal Behavior, Zoology, Pharmacology
Keywords
behavior, anxiety, fluoxetine, nicotine
Copyright
© 2016 Singer et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Singer ML, Oreschak K, Rhinehart Z, Robison BD. 2016. Anxiolytic effects of fluoxetine and nicotine exposure on exploratory behavior in zebrafish. PeerJ PrePrints 4:e1718v1

Abstract

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have emerged as a popular model for studying the pharmacology and behavior of anxiety. While there have been numerous studies documenting the anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects of common drugs in zebrafish, many do not report or test for behavioral differences between the sexes. Previous studies have indicated that males and females differ in their baseline level of anxiety. In this study, we test for a sex interaction with fluoxetine and nicotine. We exposed fish to system water (control), 10 mg/L fluoxetine, or 1 mg/L nicotine for three minutes prior to being subjected to four minutes in an open-field drop test. Video recordings were tracked using ProAnalyst. Fish from both drug treatments reduced swimming speed, increased vertical position, and increased use of the top half of the open field when compared with the control, though fluoxetine had a larger effect on depth related behaviors while nicotine mostly affected swimming speed. a significant sex effect was observed where females swam at a slower and more constant speed than males, however neither drug produced a sex-dependent response.

Author Comment

This is a submission to PeerJ for review.