NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Dataset used in the study

It includes 17 covariates, 2 outcomes, and flood exposure level, village and block names, and sampling probabilities required in the weighted analysis. Description of the data is included. Transformation of the variables are explained in the manuscript.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1687v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Llanes conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, had the research idea, interpreted results, contributed data to map.

Shishir Ranjan-Dash conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper, contributed data to map.

Alok Mukhopadhyay conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Debarati Guha-Sapir conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper, gave advice, contributed to interpreting results.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

This study was approved by the Community Health Ethics Committee, Voluntary Health Association of India, New Delhi.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Data is provided as a supplemental file.

Funding

The present research was funded by the European FP6 6th Framework Programme under The MICRODIS Project—Integrated Health, Social and Economic Impacts of Extreme Events: Evidence, Methods and Tools (contract number GOCE-CT-2007-036877). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads