Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Mar Sobral conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

María Losada performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Tania Veiga performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Javier Guitián conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

José Guitián conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Pablo Guitián conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

- The Environmental Territorial Service from León, Territorial Delegation of Government of Spain, Regional Government of Castilla and León.

- Identifier:12_LE_325_RNA_PuebladeLilio_INV; Reference: 06.01.013.016/ROT/abp; File number: AEN/LE/103/12

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

We will provide the Raw Data as Supplemental File in the corresponding section.

Funding

This study is included in the project “Color polymorphism, geographic variation in the interactions and phenotypic selection. The case of Gentiana lutea L. in the Cantabrian Mountains”, financially supported by Secretary of State of I+D+I, Ministry of Science and Innovation, Government of Spain (2011-2013). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies