Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Raw data

experiments #1 and #2 respectively: Effect of endophytes on below-ground insects and Effect of endophytes on above-ground insects

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1632v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Marie-Caroline Lefort conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Aimee C McKinnon conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Tracey L Nelson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Travis R Glare conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

I hereby confirm that the GenBank accession numbers of the DNA sequences of the phylogeny (Figure 2) will be provided prior to publication.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the MBIE Ecosystem Bioprotection programme and the Bio-Protection Research Centre for their financial support. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies