Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplementary Figure S1: Tree-sorting algorithm in PhySortR

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1609v1/supp-2

Supplementary Figure S2: Arguments within sortTrees function in PhySortR

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1609v1/supp-3

Supplementary Data S1: Simulated trees with varying N at fixed X = 100

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1609v1/supp-4

Supplementary Data S2: Simulated trees with varying X at fixed N = 1000

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1609v1/supp-5

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Timothy G Stephens conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Debashish Bhattacharya contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mark A Ragan contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Cheong Xin Chan conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Source code and manual of this toolkit are available from Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN): https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/PhySortR/

Funding

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP150101875) grant awarded to M.A.R., C.X.C, and D.B. C.X.C. is supported by Great Barrier Reef Foundation Bioinformatics Fellowship awarded to M.A.R. D.B. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation (1004213). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies