Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplemental summary data tables

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1586v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Author Contributions

William Peterman conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Emily R Brocato conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Raymond D Semlitsch contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lori S Eggert contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

University of Missouri Animal Care and Use Committee

Protocol 7403

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Permits approved and issued by the Missouri Department of Conservation.

Missouri Wildlife Collector’s permit 15584

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1621318

Funding

This research was supported by the DoD Strategic Environmental Research Development Program (RC2155) awarded to RDS, WEP, LSE and the Trans World Airline Scholarship awarded to WEP. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies