NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

A newer version of this Preprint is available: View the latest version

Supplemental Information

Supplementary Information (http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.877061)

File S1– A python script for procedures 5 and 6 – Aperture form and growth trajectory analysis on retopologised 3D shell mesh in Blender.

File S2– A python script to convert normalised elliptical Fourier coefficients to polygon mesh in Blender.

File S3 – An R script for data analysis as described in procedures 7 and 8.

File S4 – PLY ASCII mesh 3D model of Opisthostoma laidlawi Sykes 1902.

File S5 – PLY ASCII mesh 3D model of Opisthostoma crassipupa van Benthem Jutting, 1952.

File S6 – PLY ASCII mesh 3D model of Opisthostoma christae Maassen 2001.

File S7 – PLY ASCII mesh 3D model of Opisthostoma vermiculum Clements and Vermeulen, 2008.

File S8 – PLY ASCII mesh 3D model of Opisthostoma laidlawi that was reduced in size by one-half and with slight modification of the last aperture size.

File S9 – PLY ASCII mesh 3D model of Opisthostoma christae that was reshaped into an elongated form by reducing the model size (linear dimension) by one-half along the x and y axes, and by doubling the size along the z axis.

File S10 – PLY ASCII mesh 3D model of Opisthostoma christae that was reshaped into a depressed form by doubling the model size along the x and y axes, and by reducing the size by one-half along the z axis.

File S11 – PLY ASCII mesh 3D model of Opisthostoma vermiculum that consists of one Opisthostoma vermiculum original 3D model of which the aperture was connected to a second enlarged Opisthostoma vermiculum.

File S12 – A Blender file consisting of raw data of 8 shells of procedures 1 – 4. (FILE SIZE WAS TOO LARGE FOR PEERJ, PLEASE FIND THIS FILE IN FIGSHARE)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.157v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Author Contributions

Thor-Seng Liew conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

Menno Schilthuizen contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Specimens were collected in Malaysia with permissions from the Economic Planning Unit, Malaysia (UPE: 40/200/19/2524).

Grant Disclosures

The following grant information was disclosed by the authors:

project 819.01.012 of Research Council for Earth and Life Sciences (ALW-NOW)

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of related data:

http://figshare.com/preview/_preview/877061#reserve_citation

Funding

This study is funded under project 819.01.012 of Research Council for Earth and Life Sciences (ALW-NOW). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Feedback on other revisions


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads