Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Data File

Data file with columns for ID, group, CTQ responses, followed by CTQ subscale scores, then a column (AX) showing whether the participant reported abuse of at least moderate severity in any domain, then two columns showing the number of depression SCID questions coded as threshold (AY) or threshold plus definite (AZ) then sex and age. Beyond BB are the calculations for the number in each group by sex and their mean ages. With additional calculations of number of patients per CTQ category and a copy of the thresholds used.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1571v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

James E Clark analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Sean Davidson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper.

Laura Maclachlan conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments.

Megan Lynn conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments.

Julia L Newton conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Stuart Watson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Newcastle and North Tyneside2 LREC

12/NE/0146

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Raw Data will be attached with the manuscript

Funding

The study was funded by the MRC (MR/J002712/1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies