NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 1

SOURCES OF CORAL REPRODUCTIVE DATA FOR REGIONS ACROSS WESTERN AUSTRALIA

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1462v3/supp-1

SUPPLEMENTARY TEXT 1

REGIONAL VARIATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ON WESTERN AUSTRALIAN REEFS

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1462v3/supp-2

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 2

REGIONAL VARIATION IN SPAWNING FOR CORAL SPECIES ON WESTERN AUSTRALIAN REEFS

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1462v3/supp-3

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 3

TAXONOMIC REVISIONS

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1462v3/supp-4

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 4

REPRODUCTIVE OUTPUT AT A HYPOTHETICAL OCEANIC AND INSHORE REEF OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1462v3/supp-5

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

James Gilmour conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Conrad W Speed analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Russ Babcock conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any raw data.

Funding

This data synthesis was funded by the Western Australian Marine Science Institute (WAMSI), the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads