Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

High resolution Figure 6 Boxplots

Figure 6 Boxplots. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) results for selected bacterial groups. Results are expressed as relative 748 abundance of 16S rRNA gene sequences (see main text for details). * p < 0.05 against lean; # p < 0.05 against whole-wheat (WW).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1458v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jose F Garcia-Mazcorro analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ivan Ivanov performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David A. Mills conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Giuliana Noratto conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The Institutional Animal Care Use Committee from Washington State University approved all experimental procedures (animal protocol approval number: 04436-001).

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

NCBI SRA: PRJNA281761

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The data is available at SRA NCBI: PRJNA281761. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA281761/

Funding

This work was supported by the Washington Gran Commission (Grant number: 3057-4668). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies