Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Calling data for sexually attractive and unattractive males that were injected with either saline of LPS

Raw data of calling effort for sexually attractive and unattractive males that were injected with either saline of LPS.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1424v1/supp-1

Phenotypic data for sexually attractiven and unattractive males that were injected with either saline of LPS

Raw data of phenotypic traits for sexually attractive and unattractive males that were injected with either saline of LPS.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1424v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Clint D Kelly conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Melissa Telemeco conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Amy L Toth conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lyric C Bartholomay conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

We will upload to Dryad in the near future.

Funding

This study was supported by a faculty start-up grant from Iowa State University and a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to CDK. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies