Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

raw data for the validity study

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1331v1/supp-1

raw data for the reliability data

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1331v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Brian J Piper conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Shane T Mueller analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Alexander R Geerken performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Kyle L Dixon performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Gregory Kroliczak analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Reid HJ Olsen performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jeremy K Miller conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

IRB of WU approved both studies. These approval letters and consent forms will be uploaded.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

data for study I and study II uploaded.

Funding

This research was supported by the NIDA (L30 DA027582), the Husson University School of Pharmacy, the N.L. Tarter Trust Award, and NIEHS (T32 ES007060-31A1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies