Multidimensional biases, gaps and uncertainties in global plant occurrence information
- Published
- Accepted
- Subject Areas
- Biogeography, Bioinformatics, Conservation Biology, Ecology, Plant Science
- Keywords
- species distributions, knowledge gaps, data deficiency, herbarium specimens, Wallacean shortfall, Global Strategy for Plant Conservation, data bias, survey effort, Global Biodiversity Information Facility, data uncertainty
- Copyright
- © 2015 Meyer et al.
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
- Cite this article
- 2015. Multidimensional biases, gaps and uncertainties in global plant occurrence information. PeerJ PrePrints 3:e1326v2 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1326v2
Abstract
Plants are a hyperdiverse clade that plays a key role in maintaining ecological and evolutionary processes as well as human livelihoods. Glaring biases, gaps, and uncertainties in plant occurrence information remain a central problem in ecology and conservation, but these limitations have never been assessed globally. In this synthesis, we propose a conceptual framework for analyzing information biases, gaps and uncertainties along taxonomic, geographical, and temporal dimensions and apply it to all c. 370,000 species of land plants. To this end, we integrated 120 million point-occurrence records with independent databases on plant taxonomy, distributions, and conservation status. We find that different data limitations are prevalent in each dimension. Different information metrics are largely uncorrelated, and filtering out specific limitations would usually lead to extreme trade-offs for other information metrics. In light of these multidimensional data limitations, we critically discuss prospects for global plant ecological and biogeographical research, monitoring and conservation, and outline critical next steps towards more effective information usage and mobilization. We provide an empirical baseline for evaluating and improving global floristic knowledge and our conceptual framework can be applied to the study of other hyperdiverse clades.
Author Comment
Author order corrected.