Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Treeforg collected during five year in a population at central Mexico

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1199v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Griselda Cruz-Ruiz conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables.

Crystian S. Venegas-Barrera analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Hermilo Sanchez-Sanchez contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Javier Manjarrez conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

This study received the approval of the ethics committee of the Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico (Number 3589/2013SF). All subjects were treated humanely on the basis of guidelines outlined by the Society for the Study of Amphibians & Reptiles.

Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

This study received the approval of the ethics committee of the Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico (number 3589/2013SF).

Funding

This study was supported by a research grant from the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Mexico (2663/2013, 3589/2013SF). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies