Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Acclimation and lethal thermal tolerances for two species of entomopathogenic nematodes, Heterorhabditis zealandica and Steinernema yirgalemense

Error bars reflect ±1 standard error. Data represents the cohorts seperately: red indicates the first batch of experiments scored by MPH, blue indicates the second cohort of experiments scored by EL.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1152v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Matthew P Hill conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Antoinette P Malan conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

John S Terblanche conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of related data:

Datasets for this study are available on FigShare:

http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1356153

http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1356152

http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1356151

http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1356150

Funding

Funding for this research was provided to JST through Hortgro grant US-APE-NTT-2013-01. JST and AM are also supported by the National Research Foundation THRIP award and Incentive Funding for Rated researchers. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies