Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Character codings for the 66 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) used in the various analyses conducted during this study

All OTUs that were excluded from the final analysis shown in Figure 10 are noted by *. See text for further details. Abbreviations: a = polymorphic coding of 3/4; b = polymorphic coding of 4/5.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1135v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Clint A Boyd conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Darrin C Pagnac conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Funding

This research was funded via the Haslem Postdoctoral Fellowship at the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Feedback on other revisions


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies