"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Table 1

Geographic coordinates and sample sizes of O. glumaepatula populations in MQ and Guanacaste

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1095v1/supp-1

AFLP dataset for O. glumaepatula populations in CR and six O. sativa individuals

AFLP data set for Oryza glumaepatula individuals in Costa Rica and six Oryza sativa individuals. The data file includes a header row. First column indicates individual ID numbers. Second column indicates the location of analysed individuals. Successive columns hold AFLP data, with ones (1) indicating a band presence and (0) indicating the absence of a scorable band.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1095v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Eric J Fuchs conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Allan Meneses Martínez conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Amanda Calvo reviewed drafts of the paper, scored AFLP's.

Melania Muñoz reviewed drafts of the paper, scored AFLP's.

Griselda Arrieta-Espinoza conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Collections were authorized by Comisión Institucional de Biodiversidad permit VI-3150-2010 issued to Griselda Arrieta-Espinoza.


This work was funded by 1) Latin America: Multi-Country capacity building for compliance with Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (GEF-UN TP091844) and 2) Vicerrectoría de Investigación - Universidad de Costa Rica (801-B1-510). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
1 Citation   Views   Downloads