Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Source code for analysis in Matlab, correlation matrix, XML code for Crowdflower survey

1. auditory_survey_correlation_matrix.xlsx -- correlation matrix for variables gathered from the survey

2. auditory_survey_data.mat -- data used in Matlab script

3. auditory_survey_script.m -- Matlab script for analysis

4. auditory_survey_webscript.xml -- XML script used in Crowdflower

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1069v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Pavlo Bazilinskyy conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, reviewed drafts of the paper, organised outsourcing of creation of illustrations.

Joost C. F. De Winter conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The research was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) of the Delft University of Technology.

Funding

The research presented in this paper is being conducted in the project HFAuto – Human Factors of Automated Driving (PITN-GA-2013-605817). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies