Context dependency in biodiversity patterns of stream metacommunities

Department of River Ecology and Conservation, Senckenberg Research Institute, Gelnhausen, Germany
Natural Environment Centre, Biodiversity, Finnish Environment Institute, Oulu, Finland
Department of Ecosystem Research, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin, Germany
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.1040v1
Subject Areas
Biodiversity, Biogeography, Conservation Biology, Ecology, Ecosystem Science
Keywords
headwaters, beta diversity, benthic invertebrates, river network, variance partitioning, LCBD
Copyright
© 2015 Tonkin et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Tonkin JD, Heino J, Sundermann A, Haase P, Jähnig SC. 2015. Context dependency in biodiversity patterns of stream metacommunities. PeerJ PrePrints 3:e1040v1

Abstract

Context dependency is a key challenge emerging in metacommunity ecology, which is hindering the development of general ecological theories. River networks and other dendritic systems provide unique systems for examining variation in the processes shaping biodiversity between different metacommunities. We examined biodiversity patterns in five benthic invertebrate datasets, from two drainage basins in central Germany, with the aim of exploring context dependency in these systems. We used variance partitioning to disentangle the variation explained in three biodiversity metrics, including the local contribution to beta diversity (LCBD; a measure of the uniqueness of a site), by proxies of network position (i.e. catchment size and elevation) and local environmental conditions. Contrary to expectation, we found no evidence of a decline in LCBD downstream in our study. Local habitat conditions and catchment land use played a much stronger role than catchment size and elevation in explaining biodiversity metrics. Observed patterns were highly variable between different datasets in our study. These findings suggest that factors shaping biodiversity patterns in these systems are highly context dependent and less related to their position along the river network than local habitat conditions. Given the clear context dependency between datasets, we urge researchers to focus on disentangling the factors driving the high levels of variability between individual systems through the simultaneous study of a number of replicate metacommunities.

Author Comment

This will be submitted to Ecography.