February 2020

Table of Contents - PeerJ (Medicine Articles)

Sorted by citations
  • Publication date
  • Citations
  • Downloads
  • Pageviews
Medicine
  • PeerJ - Medicine articles
  • PeerJ - Biology & Life science articles
  • PeerJ - General bio (stats, legal, policy, edu)
  • PeerJ Computer Science
  • PeerJ Preprints
mathematical-biology epidemiology
Login to save + alerts
February 27, 2020
Modelling the effective reproduction number of vector-borne diseases: the yellow fever outbreak in Luanda, Angola 2015–2016 as an example
Shi Zhao, Salihu S. Musa, Jay T. Hebert, Peihua Cao, Jinjun Ran, Jiayi Meng, Daihai He, Jing Qin
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8601 PubMed 32149023
  • ← Previous
  • 1
  • Next →

Archives - Medicine

mathematical-biology epidemiology
2024
  • March 1
2023
  • March 1
  • February 1
2022
  • December 1
  • November 0
  • October 0
  • September 0
  • August 0
  • July 0
  • June 0
  • May 0
  • April 0
  • March 0
  • February 0
  • January 1
2021
  • December 1
  • November 0
  • October 0
  • September 0
  • August 0
  • July 0
  • June 0
  • May 0
  • April 0
  • March 1
  • February 2
2020
  • December 1
  • November 1
  • October 0
  • September 1
  • August 0
  • July 0
  • June 1
  • May 0
  • April 1
  • March 0
  • February 1
  • January 1
2019
  • June 1
  • May 0
  • April 0
  • March 0
  • February 0
  • January 1
2018
  • April 1
  • March 1
2017
  • September 1
  • August 0
  • July 0
  • June 1
  • May 0
  • April 0
  • March 1
  • February 0
  • January 1
2016
  • November 1
  • October 0
  • September 1
  • August 1
  • July 0
  • June 0
  • May 0
  • April 1
  • March 0
  • February 1
  • January 1
2015
  • December 1
  • November 1
  • October 0
  • September 1
  • August 2

Filter on subjects this month

  • epidemiology 1
  • mathematical-biology 1
I told my colleagues that PeerJ is a journal where they need to publish if they want their paper to be published quickly and with the strict peer review expected from a good journal.
Sohath Vanegas,
PeerJ Author
View author feedback