DJB June 2016

"Malaise of (Cyber-security) Science

Robust science has a few characteristics, among them reproducibility, repeatability, and internal as well as external validity. Due to misaligned incentive structures and poor methodology, much of scientific literature is suffused with ‘results’ that cannot be repeated by the same team, let alone be reproduced by others. [..]

#Tim Horton, EIC Lancet (a leading medical journal) put it thusly: The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken turn towards darkness."

Igor Chudov June 2022 The fact check [..] mentions three animal studies — one for each COVID vaccine — and I read each one closely. It turned out that in all three studies, experimenters killed the test animals shortly after vaccination and the subsequent challenge of animals with Sars-Cov-2. They killed them so as to make it impossible to find “safety signals” that arise in vaccinated beings post-vaccination in the long run.

This means, with all test animals dead, the scientists could not find out

whether these animals could actually reproduce

whether these animals had shortened lifespans

what happens to the test animals upon COVID reinfections

whether the test animals would be more likely to have cancers or other immune-mediated diseases

whether the test animals were more likely to suffer from other species-specific illnesses

It is very convenient to kill test animals, because this way, vaccine companies could report that “they identified no safety concerns” — and it is kind of truthful! There are no safety concerns with dead animals!"