WANT A PROFILE LIKE THIS?

Create my FREE Plan Or learn about other options

Javascript is disabled in your browser. Please enable Javascript to view PeerJ.

PeerJ Author & Reviewer

295 Points

Contributions by role

Contributions by subject area

Daniele Fanelli

PeerJ Author & Reviewer

Summary

Cell Biology Ethical Issues Molecular Biology Oncology Science Policy

Editorial Board Member

Past or current institution affiliations

Stanford University

London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London

Websites

Personal Pages

PeerJ Contributions

November 19, 2018 - Version: 5

A theory and methodology to quantify knowledge

Daniele Fanelli

https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1968v5

Signed reviews submitted for articles published in PeerJ Note that some articles may not have the review itself made public unless authors have made them open as well.

March 24, 2020

No relationship between researcher impact and replication effect: an analysis of five studies with 100 replications

John Protzko, Jonathan W. Schooler

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8014 PubMed 32231868

July 30, 2015

On the challenges of drawing conclusions from p-values just below 0.05

Daniël Lakens

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1142 PubMed 26246976

Provided feedback on

27 Jul 2014

A surge of p-values between 0.040 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)

Response to de Winter and Dodou (2014): Growing bias and the hierarchy are actually supported, despite different design, errors, and disconfirmation-biases. I appreciate the eff...

27 Jul 2014

A surge of p-values between 0.040 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)

Reply to de Winter and Dodou (2014): Growing bias and the hierarchy are actually supported, despite different design, errors, and disconfirmation-biases. I appreciate the effort...