February 2025

Table of Contents - PeerJ Computer Science

Sorted by downloads
  • Publication date
  • Downloads
  • Pageviews
Comp Sci
  • PeerJ - Medicine articles
  • PeerJ - Biology & Life science articles
  • PeerJ - General bio (stats, legal, policy, edu)
  • PeerJ Computer Science
  • PeerJ Preprints
blockchain
Login to save + alerts
February 18, 2025
Enhancing fraud detection in the Ethereum blockchain using ensemble learning
Zhexian Gu, Omar Dib
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2716
February 21, 2025
Evaluating machine learning models for predictive accuracy in cryptocurrency price forecasting
Shavez Mushtaq Qureshi, Atif Saeed, Farooq Ahmad, Asad Rehman Khattak, Sultan H. Almotiri, Mohammed A. Al Ghamdi, Muhammad Shah Rukh
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2626
February 28, 2025
Blockchain and explainable-AI integrated system for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) detection
Gowthami Jaganathan, Shanthi Natesan
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2702
  • ← Previous
  • 1
  • Next →

Archives - Computer Science

blockchain
2025
  • December 1
  • November 1
  • October 2
  • September 4
  • August 1
  • July 1
  • June 3
  • May 5
  • April 0
  • March 2
  • February 3
  • January 4
2024
  • December 1
  • November 1
  • October 0
  • September 3
  • August 0
  • July 0
  • June 1
  • May 2
  • April 2
  • March 3
  • February 2
  • January 3
2023
  • December 2
  • November 3
  • October 2
  • September 1
  • August 1
  • July 1
  • June 1
  • May 1
  • April 3
  • March 0
  • February 1
  • January 2
2022
  • October 1
  • September 1
  • August 0
  • July 0
  • June 1
  • May 1

Filter on subjects this month

  • artificial-intelligence 2
  • blockchain 3
  • cryptocurrency 2
  • data-mining-and-machine-learning 2
  • data-science 1
  • internet-of-things 1
  • neural-networks 1
I told my colleagues that PeerJ is a journal where they need to publish if they want their paper to be published quickly and with the strict peer review expected from a good journal.
Sohath Vanegas,
PeerJ Author
Quotation Mark
View author feedback