|
María Ángeles Esteban University of Murcia (Spain) |
9,110 |
|
Jafri Abdullah Universiti Sains Malaysia |
7,035 |
|
Robert Toonen Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology |
4,500 |
|
Keith Crandall George Washington University |
3,435 |
|
Abhishek Kumar German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, DKFZ) |
3,400 |
|
Donald Kramer McGill University |
3,335 |
|
Dezene Huber University of Northern British Columbia |
3,300 |
|
James Reimer University of the Ryukyus |
3,200 |
|
John Hutchinson The Royal Veterinary College |
3,100 |
|
Paul Tulkens Université catholique e Louvain |
3,040 |
|
Claus Wilke The University of Texas at Austin |
2,900 |
|
Bob Patton University of Surrey |
2,600 |
|
Ann Hedrick University of California, Davis |
2,600 |
|
Tifei Yuan Nanjing Normal University |
2,500 |
|
Andrew Farke Raymond M. Alf Museum of Paleontology |
2,500 |
Editors
PeerJ wouldn't be possible without the tremendous effort of its editorial board. Editors are awarded with 35 to 100 contribution points for each final decision made.
|
Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", School of Medicine, Bari, Italy |
245 |
|
Zoe Johnson-Ulrich |
210 |
|
|
Dmitry Shvartsman |
175 |
|
Aaron Darling University of Technology Sydney |
175 |
|
|
Lin Naing |
175 |
|
|
Abhishek Kumar German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, DKFZ) |
140 |
|
C. Titus Brown University of California, Davis |
140 |
|
Danilo Garcia Blekinge Center of Competence - Research, Development, and Innovation of Public Health |
140 |
|
|
Heinrich Mallison |
140 |
|
Mario Malički University of Split, School of Medicine |
140 |
|
|
Andrew McDonald |
140 |
|
Julia Brenda Desojo |
140 |
|
Eduardo Castro-Nallar Universidad Nacional Andrés Bello. |
140 |
|
David Coil UC Davis |
105 |
|
Christophe Hendrickx University of the Witwatersrand |
105 |
Open reviewers
No peer-reviewed journal could exist without its reviewers. This is often a major contribution within academia that goes unseen. At the same time we believe more transparency will improve how we do research.
To date ~80% of all PeerJ articles have published their reviews and >40% of referees choose to sign a named review. To further encourage named reviews, any open reviewer is awarded 35 contribution points.
|
|
Danilo Garcia Blekinge Center of Competence - Research, Development, and Innovation of Public Health |
1,955 |
|
|
Vicente Gil-Guillén |
1,485 |
|
Antonio Palazón-Bru Miguel Hernández University |
1,485 |
|
|
Trevor Archer |
1,415 |
|
Jan H. Jensen University of Copenhagen |
1,250 |
|
|
Robert Toonen Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology |
1,140 |
|
|
John Hutchinson The Royal Veterinary College |
1,080 |
|
Forest Rohwer San Diego State University |
1,010 |
|
Daniel Nettle Newcastle University |
945 |
|
Jennifer Smith University of California, San Diego |
945 |
|
Vladimir Uversky University of South Florida |
945 |
|
|
Ali Al Nima |
910 |
|
|
Gerd Karin Natvig |
910 |
|
Jean-Lou Justine Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
875 |
|
|
Ernesto Cortes Miguel Hernandez University |
875 |
PeerJ authors
PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed journal. We believe anyone choosing open access should be credited for that choice, which is why authors receive 100 points for every peer-reviewed publication. To encourage publishing of the peer-review history a further 35 points are awarded to authors making their review histories public.
|
|
Wenfa Ng |
2,380 |
|
|
Abram Hindle |
840 |
|
|
Rodrick Wallace New York State Psychiatric Institute |
735 |
|
Nabil Zary Karolinska Institutet |
595 |
|
Martin Daumer SLCMSR e.V. - The Human Motion Institute |
595 |
|
|
Kenneth Locey Indiana University at Bloomington |
525 |
|
|
Jay Lennon Indiana University |
525 |
|
Grace Gachanja Walden University |
490 |
|
|
Romany Sambo |
455 |
|
Nav Raj Adhikari Tribhuvan University Kathmandu |
455 |
|
J Gregory Caporaso Northern Arizona University |
420 |
|
|
Imadol Jeff-Eke Morehouse School of Medicine |
420 |
|
|
Don Jewett Abratech Corporation |
420 |
|
Greg Jensen Columbia University Medical Center |
385 |
|
Menno Schilthuizen Naturalis Biodiversity Center |
385 |
Preprint authors
Preliminary knowledge shouldn't have to wait, that's why PeerJ started publishing preprints in addition to the formal peer-reviewed articles.
Authors choosing to publish preprints are doing all of us a favor that should be credited. Of course the preprint itself has a DOI and will be the major credit, but in addition PeerJ also awards 35 points for each preprint.
|
|
Ivan Marchesini |
305 |
|
Ross Mounce University of Cambridge |
130 |
|
|
Andrew Farke Raymond M. Alf Museum of Paleontology |
75 |
|
Pedro Silva Universidade Fernando Pessoa |
65 |
|
|
Vahe Demirjian |
60 |
|
Stephane Joost Laboratory of Geographic Information Systems, EPFL |
45 |
|
Roberto Maffei ARPA-Firenze - Cultural association |
40 |
|
|
Lars Gamfeldt University of Gothenburg, Sweden |
40 |
|
Carlos Grijalva-Eternod UCL Institute for Global Health |
35 |
|
Emanuel Tschopp Faculdade de Ciencia e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal |
35 |
|
Roderic Page |
35 |
|
Sonia Lee |
35 |
|
Axel Newe Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg |
35 |
|
|
Mickey Mortimer |
30 |
|
Charles Warden City of Hope |
30 |
Feedback on Preprints
Similar to peer-review, informal feedback usually goes unnoticed to the wider world. We'd like to credit anyone giving valuable feedback on any published preprint. Preprint authors can choose to accept valuable feedback and anyone can upvote valuable feedback. When that happens contribution points are awarded to the feedback contributor.
|
Heather Piwowar |
135 |
|
PeerJ Staff |
125 |
|
Sarah Werning Stony Brook University |
115 |
|
|
Andrew Farke Raymond M. Alf Museum of Paleontology |
95 |
|
Pamela Ronald The University of California, Davis |
95 |
|
|
Greg Jensen Columbia University Medical Center |
70 |
|
Jonathan Tennant Imperial College London |
50 |
|
Edmund Hart National Ecological Observatory Network |
45 |
|
Corina Logan University of Cambridge |
42 |
|
|
Aaron McLean Queen Mary University of London |
40 |
|
Stephen Macknik SUNY Downstate Medical Center |
35 |
|
Christopher Lortie YorkU |
34 |
|
Pete Binfield PeerJ |
31 |
|
Daniel McGlinn Utah State University |
30 |
|
Leonardo Saravia Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento |
30 |
Answered questions
Like informal feedback, answers to questions usually go unrewarded. StackOverflow established a new standard for giving credit to programmers with knowledge and to those seeking it. We very much borrowed from that concept to build out PeerJ's Q&A annotation system.
Anyone answering a question can receive credit, you don't need to be an author to ask or answer questions.
|
|
Christopher Lortie YorkU |
45 |
|
|
Lindsey Nelson |
25 |
|
Nieky van Veggel Writtle College |
15 |
|
Jason Hoyt PeerJ |
15 |
|
|
Pete Binfield PeerJ |
10 |
|
Antoine Taly CNRS |
5 |
|
|
Ravindra Gavali |
5 |
|
Robert Gay Museums of Western Colorado |
5 |
|
Hadi Bayat |
5 |
|
|
Olaf Blaauw NA |
5 |
|
|
Nuno Ferreira |
5 |
|
|
Joshua Plotnik |
5 |
|
|
Charles Warden City of Hope |
5 |
|
Sophie Kusy PeerJ |
5 |
|
|
Paul Blair |
5 |
Asked questions
Questions are part of our annotation system. Often comments are actually structured as questions with an expectation that someone, not just an author, may have the answer.
Questions can be asked at the paragraph level on any peer-reviewed article, on any preprint, or standalone from any specific publication. These questions can then be searched as structured knowledge. PeerJ is looking to use emerging annotation standards to enable better reuse in the knowledge graph across the Web.