![]() |
44,660 |
|
![]() |
36,785 |
|
![]() |
25,530 |
|
![]() |
21,990 |
|
![]() |
19,725 |
|
![]() |
18,540 |
|
![]() |
18,465 |
|
![]() |
18,455 |
|
![]() |
15,670 |
|
![]() |
14,105 |
|
![]() |
14,015 |
|
![]() |
13,855 |
|
![]() |
12,775 |
|
![]() |
12,355 |
|
![]() |
12,310 |
PeerJ wouldn't be possible without the volunteer contributions made by the research community.
Points are awarded for various contributions, including Editing, Reviewing and Authoring articles, as well as contributing to our Q&A/Commenting system.
When Contributors reach certain points totals they receive an award that recognizes their contributions to PeerJ and Open Science.
5,000 points = Bronze
10,000 points = Silver
20,000 points = Gold
![]() |
44,560 |
|
![]() |
35,210 |
|
![]() |
25,530 |
|
![]() |
20,715 |
|
![]() |
19,710 |
|
![]() |
16,610 |
|
![]() |
16,265 |
|
![]() |
15,480 |
|
![]() |
15,365 |
|
![]() |
14,105 |
|
![]() |
13,985 |
|
![]() |
11,840 |
|
![]() |
11,740 |
|
![]() |
11,565 |
|
![]() |
11,245 |
PeerJ wouldn't be possible without the tremendous effort of its editorial board. Editors are awarded with 35 to 100 contribution points for each final decision made.
![]() |
Khanh Le Taipei Medical University |
1,280 |
![]() |
Xin Zhang Jiangmen Central Hospital |
1,190 |
![]() |
Xuxu Gou Baylor College of Medicine |
1,085 |
![]() |
Kiran Liversage University of Tartu |
975 |
![]() |
Mahmoud Ahmed Gyeongsang National University |
840 |
![]() |
840 |
|
![]() |
Khanh Le Taipei Medical University |
735 |
![]() |
Sern Wei Yeoh Northern Health |
675 |
![]() |
Rutvij Jhaveri Pandit Deendayal Energy University |
560 |
![]() |
Robert Boessenecker University of Otago |
560 |
![]() |
495 |
|
![]() |
Alexis Germán Murillo Carrasco Universidade de São Paulo |
490 |
![]() |
Georgios Laliotis The Johns Hopkins University |
490 |
![]() |
Eric Snively University of Wisconsin-La Crosse |
490 |
![]() |
450 |
No peer-reviewed journal could exist without its reviewers. This is often a major contribution within academia that goes unseen. At the same time we believe more transparency will improve how we do research.
To date ~80% of all PeerJ articles have published their reviews and >40% of referees choose to sign a named review. To further encourage named reviews, any open reviewer is awarded 35 contribution points.