- time intervals available soon

Joseph Gillespie

University of Maryland Baltimore

32,867

María Ángeles Esteban

University of Murcia (Spain)

25,115

Vladimir Uversky

University of South Florida

24,535

Jafri Abdullah

Universiti Sains Malaysia

19,005

Pedro Silva

Universidade Fernando Pessoa

16,715

James Reimer

University of the Ryukyus

15,235

Robert Toonen

University of Hawaii at Manoa

14,245

Antonio Palazón-Bru

Miguel Hernández University

14,040

Donald Kramer

McGill University

12,635

Paul Tulkens

Université catholique e Louvain

11,555

Yuriy Orlov

I.M Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia

10,500

Todd Anderson

Texas Tech University

10,300

Michael Wink

Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg

9,780

Justin Keogh

Bond University

9,675

Bao-Liang Zhong

Wuhan Mental Health Center

9,405

Editors

PeerJ wouldn't be possible without the tremendous effort of its editorial board. Editors are awarded with 35 to 100 contribution points for each final decision made.

Learn more about scoring & user contribution

Xin Zhang

Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

980

Mahmoud Ahmed

Gyeongsang National University

770

Andrew Gray

University of Otago

700

Kiran Liversage

University of Tartu

630

Robert Boessenecker

University of Otago

525

Eric Snively

University of Wisconsin-La Crosse

385

385

Ravikanth Nanduri

National Cancer Institute

315

315

Christian Kammerer

North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences

315

315

Victoria Arbour

Royal BC Museum

315

315

280

Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia

Ospedale dei Bambini "Vittore Buzzi"

280

Open reviewers

No peer-reviewed journal could exist without its reviewers. This is often a major contribution within academia that goes unseen. At the same time we believe more transparency will improve how we do research.

To date ~80% of all PeerJ articles have published their reviews and >40% of referees choose to sign a named review. To further encourage named reviews, any open reviewer is awarded 35 contribution points.

Learn more about scoring & user contribution

Danilo Garcia

Blekinge Center of Competence - Research and Innovation for the Development of Better Health and Health Equality

3,475

Robert Toonen

University of Hawaii at Manoa

2,475

John Hutchinson

The Royal Veterinary College

2,465

Justin Keogh

Bond University

2,390

Kenneth Storey

Carleton University

2,380

Antonio Palazón-Bru

Miguel Hernández University

2,195

1,925

Jonathan Eisen

University of California, Davis

1,790

Jan Jensen

University of Copenhagen

1,725

Swee Keong Yeap

Xiamen University Malaysia

1,680

Daniel Nettle

Newcastle University

1,620

1,615

1,575

1,550

G. Lorimer Moseley

University of South Australia

1,520

PeerJ authors

PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed journal. We believe anyone choosing open access should be credited for that choice, which is why authors receive 100 points for every peer-reviewed publication. To encourage publishing of the peer-review history a further 35 points are awarded to authors making their review histories public.

Learn more about scoring & user contribution

5,390

Vasco Elbrecht

University of Guelph

1,085

945

840

Thomas Backhaus

University of Gothenburg

840

Rodrick Wallace

New York State Psychiatric Institute

735

Kenneth Locey

Indiana University at Bloomington

700

Martin Daumer

SLCMSR e.V. - The Human Motion Institute

665

665

Jay Lennon

Indiana University

665

Nabil Zary

Nanyang Technological University

630

630

595

Greg Jensen

Columbia University

560

Mathew Wedel

Western University of Health Sciences

560

Preprint authors

Preliminary knowledge shouldn't have to wait, that's why PeerJ started publishing preprints in addition to the formal peer-reviewed articles.

Authors choosing to publish preprints are doing all of us a favor that should be credited. Of course the preprint itself has a DOI and will be the major credit, but in addition PeerJ also awards 35 points for each preprint.

Learn more about scoring & user contribution

500

305

Ross Mounce

Arcadia Fund

130

Andrew Farke

Raymond M. Alf Museum of Paleontology

75

Pedro Silva

Universidade Fernando Pessoa

65

60

55

Roberto Maffei

ARPA-Firenze - Cultural association

55

55

45

Stephane Joost

Laboratory of Geographic Information Systems, EPFL

45

40

Iain Reid

Rutland Senior Secondary School

40

Jim Kirkland

Utah Geological Survey

40

Lars Gamfeldt

University of Gothenburg, Sweden

40

Feedback on Preprints

Similar to peer-review, informal feedback usually goes unnoticed to the wider world. We'd like to credit anyone giving valuable feedback on any published preprint. Preprint authors can choose to accept valuable feedback and anyone can upvote valuable feedback. When that happens contribution points are awarded to the feedback contributor.

Learn more about scoring & user contribution

135

125

Sarah Werning

Des Moines University

115

Andrew Farke

Raymond M. Alf Museum of Paleontology

95

Pamela Ronald

The University of California, Davis

95

Greg Jensen

Columbia University

70

60

51

Jonathan Tennant

Imperial College London

50

Jason Hoyt

PeerJ

47

Edmund Hart

National Ecological Observatory Network

45

Corina Logan

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

42

Aaron Lawson McLean

Jena University Hospital

40

Stephen Macknik

SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University

35

34

Answered questions

Like informal feedback, answers to questions usually go unrewarded. StackOverflow established a new standard for giving credit to programmers with knowledge and to those seeking it. We very much borrowed from that concept to build out PeerJ's Q&A annotation system.

Anyone answering a question can receive credit, you don't need to be an author to ask or answer questions.

Learn more about scoring & user contribution

45

25

Nieky van Veggel

Writtle University College

15

Jason Hoyt

PeerJ

15

10

5

5

Robert Gay

Colorado Canyons Association

5

5

5

5

5

Charles Warden

City of Hope

5

Sophie Kusy

PeerJ

5

5

Asked questions

Questions are part of our annotation system. Often comments are actually structured as questions with an expectation that someone, not just an author, may have the answer.

Questions can be asked at the paragraph level on any peer-reviewed article, on any preprint, or standalone from any specific publication. These questions can then be searched as structured knowledge. PeerJ is looking to use emerging annotation standards to enable better reuse in the knowledge graph across the Web.

Learn more about scoring & user contribution