|
María Ángeles Esteban University of Murcia (Spain) |
13,215 |
|
Jafri Abdullah Universiti Sains Malaysia |
10,035 |
|
James Reimer University of the Ryukyus |
7,535 |
|
Robert Toonen Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology |
6,270 |
|
Donald Kramer McGill University |
5,735 |
|
Dezene Huber University of Northern British Columbia |
5,270 |
|
Paul Tulkens Université catholique e Louvain |
5,240 |
|
Keith Crandall George Washington University |
5,135 |
|
Ann Hedrick University of California, Davis |
4,500 |
|
Michael Wink Heidelberg University |
4,135 |
|
John Hutchinson The Royal Veterinary College |
3,900 |
|
Virginia Abdala CONICET |
3,835 |
|
Jennifer Vonk Oakland University |
3,800 |
|
Claus Wilke University of Texas at Austin |
3,800 |
|
Stuart Pimm Duke University |
3,770 |
Editors
PeerJ wouldn't be possible without the tremendous effort of its editorial board. Editors are awarded with 35 to 100 contribution points for each final decision made.
|
Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia Fondazione MBBM, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy |
245 |
|
Zoe Johnson-Ulrich |
245 |
|
|
Lin Naing |
210 |
|
|
Mike Thiv |
210 |
|
Manu Saunders University of New England |
210 |
|
Abhishek Kumar German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, DKFZ) |
175 |
|
|
Eric Snively University of Wisconsin-La Crosse |
175 |
|
C. Titus Brown University of California, Davis |
175 |
|
|
Dmitry Shvartsman |
175 |
|
Aaron Darling University of Technology Sydney |
175 |
|
|
Robert Boessenecker University of Otago |
175 |
|
Eduardo Castro-Nallar Universidad Nacional Andrés Bello. |
175 |
|
Christophe Hendrickx University of the Witwatersrand |
140 |
|
Danilo Garcia Blekinge Center of Competence - Research, Development, and Innovation of Public Health |
140 |
|
|
Heinrich Mallison |
140 |
Open reviewers
No peer-reviewed journal could exist without its reviewers. This is often a major contribution within academia that goes unseen. At the same time we believe more transparency will improve how we do research.
To date ~80% of all PeerJ articles have published their reviews and >40% of referees choose to sign a named review. To further encourage named reviews, any open reviewer is awarded 35 contribution points.
|
|
Danilo Garcia Blekinge Center of Competence - Research, Development, and Innovation of Public Health |
2,360 |
|
Antonio Palazón-Bru Miguel Hernández University |
1,755 |
|
|
Vicente Gil-Guillén |
1,620 |
|
|
Trevor Archer |
1,550 |
|
|
John Hutchinson The Royal Veterinary College |
1,385 |
|
Daniel Nettle Newcastle University |
1,350 |
|
Jan H. Jensen University of Copenhagen |
1,250 |
|
|
Ernesto Cortes Miguel Hernandez University |
1,145 |
|
|
Robert Toonen Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology |
1,140 |
|
Jennifer Smith University of California, San Diego |
1,080 |
|
Jonathan Eisen University of California, Davis |
1,080 |
|
Forest Rohwer San Diego State University |
1,075 |
|
Paul Jokiel University of Hawaii |
1,070 |
|
|
Ali Al Nima |
1,045 |
|
Dimitrios Vlachakis Academy of Athens |
1,015 |
PeerJ authors
PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed journal. We believe anyone choosing open access should be credited for that choice, which is why authors receive 100 points for every peer-reviewed publication. To encourage publishing of the peer-review history a further 35 points are awarded to authors making their review histories public.
|
Wenfa Ng |
3,325 |
|
|
Abram Hindle |
945 |
|
|
Rodrick Wallace New York State Psychiatric Institute |
735 |
|
|
Kenneth Locey Indiana University at Bloomington |
665 |
|
Nabil Zary Nanyang Technological University |
630 |
|
Martin Daumer SLCMSR e.V. - The Human Motion Institute |
630 |
|
|
Jay Lennon Indiana University |
630 |
|
Vasco Elbrecht Ruhr University Bochum |
595 |
|
|
Angelo Facchiano |
525 |
|
|
Imadol Jeff-Eke Morehouse School of Medicine |
525 |
|
Grace Gachanja Walden University |
490 |
|
Jonathan Lefcheck Virginia Institute of Marine Science, The College of William & Mary |
490 |
|
Thomas Backhaus University of Gothenburg |
490 |
|
|
Florian Leese |
490 |
|
Menno Schilthuizen Naturalis Biodiversity Center |
455 |
Preprint authors
Preliminary knowledge shouldn't have to wait, that's why PeerJ started publishing preprints in addition to the formal peer-reviewed articles.
Authors choosing to publish preprints are doing all of us a favor that should be credited. Of course the preprint itself has a DOI and will be the major credit, but in addition PeerJ also awards 35 points for each preprint.
|
|
Ivan Marchesini |
305 |
|
|
Vahe Demirjian |
190 |
|
Ross Mounce University of Cambridge |
130 |
|
Andrew Farke Raymond M. Alf Museum of Paleontology |
75 |
|
Pedro Silva Universidade Fernando Pessoa |
65 |
|
|
Mickey Mortimer |
55 |
|
Roberto Maffei ARPA-Firenze - Cultural association |
55 |
|
|
Tim Williams |
50 |
|
|
Philip Young |
45 |
|
Stephane Joost Laboratory of Geographic Information Systems, EPFL |
45 |
|
Brad McFeeters |
40 |
|
Jim Kirkland Utah Geological Survey |
40 |
|
|
Lars Gamfeldt University of Gothenburg, Sweden |
40 |
|
Carlos Grijalva-Eternod UCL Institute for Global Health |
35 |
|
Emanuel Tschopp Faculdade de Ciencia e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal |
35 |
Feedback on Preprints
Similar to peer-review, informal feedback usually goes unnoticed to the wider world. We'd like to credit anyone giving valuable feedback on any published preprint. Preprint authors can choose to accept valuable feedback and anyone can upvote valuable feedback. When that happens contribution points are awarded to the feedback contributor.
|
Heather Piwowar |
135 |
|
PeerJ Staff |
125 |
|
Sarah Werning Stony Brook University |
115 |
|
|
Andrew Farke Raymond M. Alf Museum of Paleontology |
95 |
|
Pamela Ronald The University of California, Davis |
95 |
|
Greg Jensen Columbia University Medical Center |
70 |
|
Jonathan Tennant Imperial College London |
50 |
|
Edmund Hart National Ecological Observatory Network |
45 |
|
Corina Logan University of Cambridge |
42 |
|
|
Aaron McLean Queen Mary University of London |
40 |
|
Stephen Macknik SUNY Downstate Medical Center |
35 |
|
Christopher Lortie YorkU |
34 |
|
Pete Binfield PeerJ |
31 |
|
Daniel McGlinn College of Charleston |
30 |
|
Leonardo Saravia Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento |
30 |
Answered questions
Like informal feedback, answers to questions usually go unrewarded. StackOverflow established a new standard for giving credit to programmers with knowledge and to those seeking it. We very much borrowed from that concept to build out PeerJ's Q&A annotation system.
Anyone answering a question can receive credit, you don't need to be an author to ask or answer questions.
|
|
Christopher Lortie YorkU |
45 |
|
|
Lindsey Nelson |
25 |
|
Nieky van Veggel Writtle College |
15 |
|
Jason Hoyt PeerJ |
15 |
|
|
Pete Binfield PeerJ |
10 |
|
Antoine Taly CNRS |
5 |
|
|
Ravindra Gavali |
5 |
|
Robert Gay Museums of Western Colorado |
5 |
|
Hadi Bayat |
5 |
|
|
Olaf Blaauw NA |
5 |
|
|
Nuno Ferreira |
5 |
|
|
Joshua Plotnik |
5 |
|
Charles Warden City of Hope |
5 |
|
Sophie Kusy PeerJ |
5 |
|
|
Paul Blair |
5 |
Asked questions
Questions are part of our annotation system. Often comments are actually structured as questions with an expectation that someone, not just an author, may have the answer.
Questions can be asked at the paragraph level on any peer-reviewed article, on any preprint, or standalone from any specific publication. These questions can then be searched as structured knowledge. PeerJ is looking to use emerging annotation standards to enable better reuse in the knowledge graph across the Web.