Frequent Questions

Many common questions and answers about PeerJ and its publications can be found here

If you still have a question, please email us at
"Open source software has transformed the practice of software development. So, it is about time for an open access computer science journal to bring Computer Science research publishing into the 21st century. It's great to be part of helping to make that happen!"
Tim O'Reilly
CEO O'Reilly Media and member of PeerJ Board of Directors
Tim O'Reilly
PeerJ Factsheet
A one-page facts and stats PDF, to help when considering journal options with your co-authors.
Download Factsheet
I told my colleagues that PeerJ is a journal where they need to publish if they want their paper to be published quickly and with the strict peer review expected from a good journal.
Sohath Vanegas,
PeerJ Author
View author feedback


Our Editorial and Advisory Board members told us that publishing in computer science was ripe for change. In order to fully address the changing needs of the computer science community we soon realised that we would need to create a dedicated space to do this.

The Computer Science community has different publication expectations, so by building a dedicated journal we are able to iterate based on the feedback from the community. For instance publication in Computer Science mostly happens at conferences, and journal publication in this field is often very slow and rarely open access. By offering a dedicated open access journal we can help to educate the community on the benefits of publishing this way. Also, we may even be able to operate at the intersection of conference and journal publishing by creatively adding elements to our platform that mirrors some of the publishing experience found at conferences.

We were already proud of the speed of publication we offer the biomedical community (currently a median of 27 days to a first decision), and we want PeerJ Computer Science to operate at similar speeds. However, the way we operate our editorial and peer-review criteria too may need to be different for this community. For instance theoretical papers are very much part of the output of the Computer Science community, and we also hope to be creative when it comes to integrating source code and utilizing it.

Computer Science is a field that has only minimal overlap with bio/medicine, so rather than pool the needs of each community together we wanted to address them in a more dedicated way. Our readers are still able to search simultaneously across both journals, so it will be a seamless experience from that perspective.

So to use Computer Science terminology – we merely ‘forked’ off a new journal with its own traits and paths, but our core mission still remains the same.

Authors pay an Article Processing charge of just $1,195 or purchase a lifetime Membership (as described here), which entitles them to publish freely thereafter (subject to certain annual volume limits, depending on the plan).
After launching PeerJ, we received a lot of requests from the Computer Science community to expand into their areas. Publication in Computer Science mostly happens at conferences, and as a result it is often quite expensive; articles may be rejected based on perceived impact or prestige; and the resulting output is often not openly available to readers. In contrast, journal publication in this field is often very slow, and is also rarely open access. We believe that PeerJ Computer Science can address many of the unmet needs of this community, by providing a fresh, flexible, innovative, rapid, and fully open access publication venue.
Although we took extensive feedback on the list of subject areas, we appreciate that the list may need further refinement or expansion. As a result, now that the journal is publicly announced, we are taking feedback from the wider community as to what their needs are. At present, nothing is set in silicon, so if you have a specific subject area(s) you would like to see listed, please email us at Bear in mind though that any such list is always a compromise and has to balance several needs (e.g. the list shouldn't be too long; it should work for authors but also for readers; it should use the most widely understood terminology etc) - therefore we may not be able to accommodate all requests.
We do accept Application Notes. We are continually taking feedback from the wider community as to what their needs are. Even now, nothing is set in silicon, so if you have a specific requirement, or a type of article you want to see included, then please email us at
For the six months from 1st Sept 2016 to 1st March 2017, articles which entered peer review had a first decision in a median time of 30 days.
We opened for submissions on Feb 12th 2015, and we published our first articles in April 2015.
You can find the latest author instructions right here, but we also try to make the submission experience as easy as possible within the workflow with intuitive and just-in-time prompts to guide you through your submission.
We are happy to accept LaTeX submissions (our production group has an ‘all-TeX’ workflow). Please use our LaTeX template hosted at Overleaf.
We are already indexed on the Web of Science platform and starting with the 2019 Impact Factor will be included in the WoS SCIE database, in Google Scholar, dblp, CiteSeerX, Scopus, DOAJ, the ProQuest databases, OCLC, Inspec, Inspec Analytics and ScienceOpen.

Although we cannot make any guarantees, we expect to be indexed in the appropriate computer science indexing services including for example ACM Digital Library, Microsoft Academic Search etc.